Faith * College * Career * Service * Saint * Heaven
- Philosophical Difference on How Children Learn – Social Learning is Not Conforming – Is Not Mass Production Education
- Highly Relational by Design – Have Students for More Than One Year – Investment is Deep by Teachers, Parents and Students
- Citizenship in the Classroom – Community, Social Learning
- Essential Learning Taking Place in a Learning Community
- Learning is a social activity (Piaget, Erikson, Vygotsky); One (1) Learning Community
- All Children can Succeed – We Advocate for Children
- A Child Centered Classroom – Students Own Their Learning and Are Responsible for Their Choices
- A Learning Community with Classrooms of Mixed Abilities/Ages/Grades that is Intentional and Deliberately Constructed for the Benefit of the Children with Potential for All Children to Succeed
- Respect for Each Child as a Learner is Foundation of Instruction and Curriculum Decisions
- Continuous learning driven by the Common Core State Standards, California State Standards and Archdiocesan Standards
- Standards are Purposeful and Meaningful
- Not driven by textbooks – Teacher Centered vs. Child Centered
- Tiered Lesson Plan for Ability Levels – Enrichment, Grade Level and Support (Remediation)
- Differentiation and Collaboration
- Students Are Supported to Master Standards and Rise to the Next Level
- Standardized Test Do Not Drive Curriculum
- Standardized Test Drive the Development of Effective Lesson Plans After Dissemination of Data for All Levels of Learners
- Conforming to a Test is Not the Measure of Learning Growth or Future Success
- The Effective Teacher Designs Lessons for Students of All Levels and Learning Styles
- Students Learn at Individual Pace with Support (Montessori)
- Students are Thinkers – Ability to Discern for Themselves
- All Growth Can Not be Measured by Assessments – Affective Growth – Confidence, Desire, Critical Thinking
- Students are Not Limited to Perform with Standards at Their Age or Grade Level; Boundaries are Not Built
- Children Learn on Continuum of Standards Regardless of Age or Level
- Curriculum Decisions are Made That Will Address the Span of the Grade Levels and Abilities of Students – Differentiation and Effective Teaching Strategies Based Upon the Multiple Intelligences
- Scope and Sequence of Standards Driven by Curriculum Mapping
- Learning “Outside the Textbook” as Field Trips Are Real Life Opportunities
- Child’s Developmental Levels are Addressed (Piaget, Erikson, Vygostsky)
- Teach Compassion and Tolerance for Differences
- In the Real World We Do Not Work with People of the Same Age or Ability
- Direct, Guided, Whole Group Instruction of Common Core Standards
- Identify Essential Common Core Standards Critical for Success on Next Standards and Preparation for College and Career – Identify “Essential” Standards
- Huge Commitment by Teacher
- Cross Curriculum Instruction – Plan Big Units
- Children Feel Success – Hook Students into Learning – Student Responsibility
- Literature Circles – Leveled Reading Groups with Level Appropriate Novels
- Exposure to Literature at All Levels Including Academic Vocabulary
- Instructional Methodology – Direct Guided Instruction, Minimal Whole Group Instruction, Small Group Instruction (Primary), Independent Work with Support, Collaborative Learning (Learning Community) and Cross Age Collaboration
- Develops Critical Thinkers, Independent Learners, Leaders, Problem Solvers, Role Models
- Develops Conflict Resolution, Peer Relations, Responsibility and Self Esteem in a Rich Environmental Environment
- Teachers Follow Students for More Than One (1) Year
- Teachers Know Each Students Strengths and Areas for Improvement Intimately
- Strong Bond Between Teacher and Student
- Mentor Relationship Between Teacher and Student and Student and Student
- Teachers Facilitate Student Learning; Teachers Are Not Just Dispenser of Knowledge
- A Partnership between Teachers, Students and Parents is Vital and Collaboration is the Norm